

I have been thinking about this topic, posted by me now, during the past few days.
I would like to define GOD in three words :
GOD -
G-- Greatest
O-- Obfuscated
D-- Delusion
We, the human species, in the dilemma of our own existence, fall into a delusion in a fallacious manner. I would rather suggest that the most intelligent and rational point of view would be to be an AGNOSTIC. Agnostic, as it is, does not put into restrictions about our free will, which is the basic and essential characteristic of the human species.
If you feel that you are an atheist, you will sometimes fall into your own treacherous pit. There would be situations in which you will feel that your own thoughts and commitments are betraying you. You will fall in a vicious loop of singularity of your own thought, with even more positive feedback, to make you unstable and deviate from your very own will to be an atheist. Like you can consider a situation like this : Somebody asks you- who are you?, from where did you came?, what's your purpose of existence?, what's so special about life?, what is absolute zero?, what is infinity?, what is beyond Universe?, why does the nature exists on such a large scale?, and if it does, why are we( the human beings) hanging on a scale so inexplicable in its size?, what is consciousness?, what are the fundamental entities?, on what scale does the fractal nature of the nature can exist?, what is chaos?, why do we exist in between so bizarre nature?, what's the purpose of self organizing nature on earth or beyond?, why are we odd one out in such a vast empty spaces of Universe?.
I even do not assert that in order to answer these questions, you need to become a believer of God and start abandoning all other religion of practices and beliefs. Even the person indulged in religion or in God, will not be able to answer these questions, and if asked, will try to escape the arena by simply giving the name- GOD to all these questions and the plausble answers.
I do think, that an agnostic can well escape and answer these questions, because, he is puzzled by all these questions, and do believe that these is something very abstruse, obstruct, confound, profound, abstract, obfuscated, inexplicable about these questions. He does believe that they are hard to explain, but, refuses to belief that one should start indulging himself in religious practices, and start praying to God to reveal Himself before his own death, which is not possible anyway in his minute life span of 100 years. He always get disturbed by all those questions, and tries to find the answers to all these questions. He can't deprecate the Complexity of nature, which is clearly visible by few of the questions above. He do believe, that there should be something, or rather, may be something, which can answer all the answers, or a few of them. He respects Nature, and love its unconquerable complexity. Neither he is an atheist, nor a perfect believer. He is a sceptic, and will always remain sceptic for rest of his life. The definition of God, may be different for different individuals. Some try to simply sit and except their meagreness. Some simply try to avoid or rather ignore the answers to these questions. And the most intelligent ones, i.e- the Agnostics, try to explain and give different answers to these speculations. He is always engaged in finding the truth, because he wants to remove his scepticism.
So, I would simply like to put forward few words in favour of my post, and would say that, if God would have been alive, then there would be No such thing as Evolution, which is such a fundamental property of the Entire Nature.




0 comments:
Post a Comment